Method line M3 · When and why do we use it?

Mathematical Induction

In the Chinese book: 数学归纳法

Topple the first, let each topple the next. Pick the base, step and statement.

📖 Chapter 3 of 《解题方法与策略》

One idea, one pictureChoose the statement “ is prime”, push the first domino and watch where the chain breaks. Then try the other statements and different starting points.

Loading figure…

In one sentence

Let be a statement about a positive integer . If

  1. Base case: holds;
  2. Inductive step: whenever holds (with ), follows,

then holds for every . It is like a row of dominoes: the first one falls, each one knocks over the next, so they all fall.

“I checked lots of cases” is not enough. In the figure above, is prime for every from to , but at it equals .

Example: 1 + 3 + 5 + … + (2n − 1) = n²

Step 1 / 4
Loading figure…
  1. Base case

    : the left side is and the right side is . True, so the first domino can be pushed over.

Predict first

Take the statement . From which on does it hold for every (give the smallest )?

Choose an answer first; then you can see the result.

Stop 1 · Strong induction (Vol. 5)

When the recurrence involves the previous two terms, assuming alone is not enough: assume both and , and check two base cases as well.

Example: a₁ = 1, a₂ = 3, aₙ₊₂ = 3aₙ₊₁ − 2aₙ. Prove that aₙ = 2ⁿ − 1

Step 1 / 4
  1. Base case: two dominoes

    , .

Stop 2 · Choosing the right step size (Vol. 5)

You do not have to go from to . If going from to is more natural, take steps of ; just get starting points ready.

Example: any postage of n ≥ 8 cents can be made with 3-cent and 5-cent stamps

Step 1 / 4
  1. Choose step size 3

    If you can make cents, one more -cent stamp makes cents. Each step jumps by .

Stop 3 · Strengthening the statement (Vol. 5)

Sometimes the original statement is “too weak”: the induction hypothesis does not give enough to push on. Proving a stronger statement goes through more easily.

One problem, several solutions

Prove that for every positive integer , .

Plain induction: stuck

Suppose . Then .

The right side is bigger than , so nothing follows. The trouble is that “” does not say how far below we are.

CostThe hypothesis only says “less than 2”; after one more term, you know nothing.

Strengthen to S_n ≤ 2 − 1/n

: , true. Suppose . Then

This uses . Hence .

CostA stronger claim, but also a stronger hypothesis: just enough.

Stop 4 · Proving the mean inequality (Vol. 6)

Cauchy's forward–backward induction: first leap along , then step back one at a time to fill in the in between.

Example: prove that the arithmetic mean of n positive numbers is ≥ their geometric mean

Step 1 / 4
  1. Base case n = 2

    is equivalent to .

Practice

Exercise 1Basic

With -cent and -cent stamps (as many as you like), what is the largest postage, in cents, that cannot be made?

Exercise 2Basic

What is the smallest positive integer such that for every ?

Exercise 3Advanced

Prove that for every positive integer , .

Exercise 4Challenge

Given and , prove that for every positive integer .

Mistake Museum · Exhibits from this stop

Before you leave, look at the traps other people fell into here.See every exhibit in the museum →

Exhibit

Proving the step but never checking the base

The wrong step: Prove . Suppose . Adding to both sides gives , so holds. Hence it holds for all .
What went wrong? Think first, then open

Diagnosis The inductive step really is fine, but says , which is false. Every domino would knock over the next one, but nobody pushes the first, so not a single one falls.

The right step: Induction needs both halves: the base case ( holds) and the inductive step ().

“Push the first domino first”

Exhibit

Step size 3, but only one base case

The wrong step: Prove that every postage of cents can be made with -cent and -cent stamps: works; if can be made, add one -cent stamp to get . Done.
What went wrong? Think first, then open

Diagnosis Starting from and stepping by only proves . Nothing ever reaches , or the numbers that follow them.

The right step: With step size you need three base cases: , , . Only the three chains together cover every .

“Step by k, check k starting points”

Stops on this line

The same idea, used once in each of several places.

  1. The First Principle of InductionVol. 5 Sequences and Mathematical Induction, ch. 1
  2. The Second Principle of InductionVol. 5 Sequences and Mathematical Induction, ch. 2
  3. Choosing the Right Step SizeVol. 5 Sequences and Mathematical Induction, ch. 11
  4. Choosing What to Induct OnVol. 5 Sequences and Mathematical Induction, ch. 12
  5. Proofs of the Mean InequalitiesVol. 6 The Mean Inequalities and the Cauchy Inequality, §1.2
  6. Several Proofs of the AM–GM InequalityVol. 5 Sequences and Mathematical Induction, ch. 10
  7. Changing the StatementVol. 5 Sequences and Mathematical Induction, ch. 13
  8. Guess, Then ProveVol. 5 Sequences and Mathematical Induction, ch. 14