In one sentence
In mathematical induction, the induction hypothesis is all the capital you have. The stronger the conclusion you set out to prove, the stronger the hypothesis. So when a direct proof gets stuck, deliberately make the statement stronger:
- strengthen the statement: write the “room” into the conclusion, e.g. change into ;
- use an auxiliary statement: first prove a property that carries over from step to step, and get the original statement as a corollary;
- generalize the statement: put the special case inside a more general statement that is easier to induct on.
It sounds like asking for trouble — you have more to prove, and yet it gets easier.
Example: 1 + 1/4 + 1/9 + … + 1/n² < 2
Step 1 / 5- Straight induction
Assume . Then . The bound got bigger, so does not follow. Every step in the table is ✗ — not because the statement is wrong, but because the hypothesis is too weak.
Predict first
To prove by induction, which strengthened statement lets the induction go through (base case and every step)?
leaves too little room: the step at gets stuck (). equals at , so the base case already fails. holds for , but it is itself false: , and eventually passes . Only is just right.
Check in the figure above by setting to , and .
Stop 1 · Sequences: an auxiliary statement
Example A sequence has and (). Prove that every term is an integer.
Straight induction: if are integers, is one integer divided by another, which is not necessarily an integer. The hypothesis lacks information like “ divides ”. Compute a few terms: — could it be that ?
Auxiliary statement: it satisfies a linear recurrence
Step 1 / 4- Write two neighboring equations
By definition ; replacing by gives .
Stop 2 · Combinatorics: generalize the statement
Example Remove a corner cell from a board. Prove that the rest can be tiled by L-trominoes (a square minus one cell).
Straight induction: cut the board into four quarters. The hypothesis handles the quarter with the missing corner — but the other three quarters are complete, with no cell missing, and the hypothesis says nothing about them.
Generalize: remove any one cell
Step 1 / 4- Make the statement more general
Prove: a board with any one cell removed can be tiled by L-trominoes. The corner cell is just a special case.
Proving only “corner removed”, the hypothesis is too narrow; generalize to “any cell removed” and the hypothesis is wide enough for the induction to turn. It is the same idea as in the first example.
Practice
Find .
Compute (as a fraction in lowest terms) and check that it really is at most the bound from the strengthened statement.
For the sequence of Stop 1, find .
Prove that for every positive integer , .