In one sentence
Proof by contradiction: to prove , assume first that is false. Treat “not ” as a new condition, reason with it together with , and keep going until you reach a contradiction: with the given conditions, with a theorem, or with itself. Since “not ” cannot stand, is true.
Three moves: assume the opposite (state the negation of the conclusion precisely) → derive a contradiction (the key step) → conclude.
Example: there are infinitely many primes (Euclid)
Step 1 / 4- Assume the opposite
Suppose there are only finitely many primes, and list all of them: . In the picture, start with .
Predict first
Suppose all the primes are . Then . Is prime?
No: . Many people believe that the in Euclid’s proof must be prime, but that is not true. The proof only uses the fact that “the prime factors of are not on the list”. Neither nor is on the list, so the contradiction still stands. Select these six primes in the picture above to check.
Stop 1 · Properties of Sets (Vol. 1)
“The set cannot have just one element.” The conclusion is negative, and it is hard to know where to start directly. Assume it has just one element, and the condition at once becomes an equation.
Example: a set A of real numbers satisfies 1 ∉ A, and if a ∈ A then 1/(1 − a) ∈ A. Prove that A cannot have exactly one element
Step 1 / 4- Assume the opposite
Suppose has just one element, where .
Stop 2 · The well-ordering principle (Vol. 5)
Team up proof by contradiction with “smallest”, and you get infinite descent: assume there is a solution, take the “smallest” one, then build an even smaller one. Contradiction.
One problem, several solutions
Prove that is irrational.
Lowest terms + parity
Assume , where are coprime positive integers. Then , so is even, and therefore is even.
Write . Then , so is even too. Both and are even, contradicting the fact that they are coprime.
CostThe most common proof; you must say “in lowest terms” first.
Infinite descent (well-ordering principle)
Assume . Among all such representations, the positive integer has a smallest value; take a representation with the smallest .
As before, gives and . So , and (because ).
We have found a representation with a smaller denominator, contradicting the choice of the smallest .
CostNo “lowest terms”; use “smallest denominator” instead. The same skeleton proves that many Diophantine equations have no solutions.
Stop 3 · Functional equations (Vol. 2)
“No such function exists”: another negative conclusion. Assume it exists, and use special values to back it into a corner.
Example: prove there is no injection f: ℝ → ℝ such that f(x²) − (f(x))² ≥ 1/4 for every real x
Step 1 / 4- Assume the opposite
Suppose such an injection exists. The condition holds for every ; pick the values with .
Practice
Suppose all the primes are . Build as Euclid did. What is the smallest prime factor of ?
How many integer solutions does the equation have?
Prove that is irrational.
Let all be odd. Prove that the equation has no rational root.