Method stop · When and why do we use it?

The Second Principle of Induction

In the Chinese book: 第二数学归纳法

To prove P(k+1), use all earlier cases, not just P(k). You may need more bases.

📖 Chapter 2 of 《数列与数学归纳法》M3 Mathematical Induction line

Before this stop, visit:The First Principle of Induction (Method)

One idea, one pictureYou only have 3-cent and 5-cent stamps. Click cells to make some amounts hand-checked base cases, so that everything from some point on lights up. What is the smallest number of bases you need?

Loading figure…

In one sentence

The second principle of mathematical induction (strong induction):

  1. Base case: is true;
  2. Inductive step: assuming are all true, prove that is true.

Then holds for every positive integer .

It is really the same thing as the first principle: let be the statement “ are all true” and apply the first principle to . The only difference is how it feels to use: to knock over the next domino, you may use any of the earlier ones, not only the one right before it. But be careful: if uses , then all need their own base case. The grid below shows you why.

Example: 3-cent and 5-cent stamps pay any amount of 8 cents or more

Step 1 / 5
Loading figure…
  1. The recursive link

    If you can pay cents, add one -cent stamp and you can pay cents. So follows from : the step looks back three cells, not one. The cells are laid out in columns, so sits right above .

Predict first

You only have -cent and -cent stamps. From which amount on can every amount be paid?

cents
Choose an answer first; then you can see the result.

In general, when and are coprime, the largest amount that cannot be paid is (, ). This fact itself can also be checked with the method of this stop.

Stop 1 · Algebra: each term needs the two before it

If is an integer, prove that is an integer for every positive integer .

Write . You cannot get from alone, but the identity below uses both and :

Example: x + 1/x is an integer

Step 1 / 4
  1. Find the link

    Multiply by , and an extra appears.

Stop 2 · Number theory: jumping far back

Every integer greater than can be written as a product of primes.

Here does not use . It uses “some two numbers smaller than ”, and we do not know in advance which two. This is exactly what strong induction is for.

Example: every integer has a prime factorization

Step 1 / 4
  1. Base case

    is prime, so it is itself a product of primes (with one factor).

If only one base case is checked

Break it

Counterexample lab: remove one condition

Conclusion: for every

. Inductive step: if and , then . Both base cases are already set.

Loading figure…

Practice

Exercise 1Basic

You only have -cent and -cent stamps. What is the largest amount (in cents) that cannot be paid?

Exercise 2Basic

The sequence . Find , and prove by strong induction that .

Exercise 3Advanced

Prove that every positive integer is a sum of distinct powers of (for example ).

Exercise 4Challenge

Given , find .

Mistake Museum · Exhibits from this stop

Before you leave, look at the traps other people fell into here.See every exhibit in the museum →

Exhibit

The step uses two earlier terms, but only one base case is checked

The wrong step: The sequence . “Proof” that : for , . Suppose and . Then .
What went wrong? Think first, then open

Diagnosis The inductive step uses two earlier terms. The first time it can be used is for , and then it needs and . But was never checked. In fact , then , and the conclusion is wrong all the way.

The right step: If the step uses several earlier terms, check that many base cases: here you must check both and . As soon as you do, you find that is false.

“Look back as many cells as each step looks back”