WorkbenchFind the minimum of x2+x16 (x>0). Change how many parts each term is split into until “Product of the parts” shows ✓, and watch the dashed line turn into a horizontal line touching the curve.
Loading figure…
What this move does
The mean inequality links “sum” and “product”:
nx1+⋯+xn≥nx1⋯xn.
So when the product is fixed, the sum has a minimum; when the sum is fixed, the product has a maximum. To use it for extreme values, remember three checks: positive, fixed, equal.
Positive: every term involved is a positive number.
Fixed: by splitting terms and balancing coefficients, make the product (or the sum) of these terms a constant that does not depend on the variable.
Equal: the equality condition (all terms equal) can really be met within the range the problem allows. Otherwise all you have is a bound.
Predict first
Let x>0. What is the minimum of x2+x16?
Choose an answer first; then you can see the result.
✓You predicted it!✗Using two-term AM–GM directly: x² · 16/x = 16x is not constant, so you get no constant lower bound.
Split x16 into two parts: x2+x8+x8≥33x2⋅x8⋅x8=3364=12.
Equality holds if and only if x2=x8, that is, x=2; and f(2)=4+8=12. So the minimum is 12.
Work through one
Example: the minimum of x² + 16/x (x > 0)
Step 1 / 5
Loading figure…
Positive
x>0, so both terms are positive and AM–GM can be used.
f(x)=x2+x16,x>0
Used directly: the product is not fixed
Fixed: split a term
Equal
The split is not unique
“A fixed sum gives the largest product” is the same fact seen the other way round. For a rectangle with fixed perimeter, the sum of the sides a,b is fixed: the area is ab=G2, and G≤A.
Loading figure…
Drag the split point C: the diameter (a+b) stays the same, and the half-chord ab is longest right in the middle, so the square has the largest area.
When it fails
Break it
Counterexample lab: remove one condition
Conclusion: the bound from AM–GM is the minimum← still true?
x+x4 (x>0): the product is the constant 4, so x+x4≥4, reached at x=2.
Loading figure…
The same function, but now only x≥3 is allowed.
Loading figure…
x+x4≥4 is still true, but x=2 is out of range, so 4 is never reached. On x≥3 the function is increasing, and the true minimum is f(3)=3+34=313.
“Equal” is not a formality: if equality cannot be reached, switch tools (here, monotonicity).
Practice
Exercise 1Basic
Let x>0. Find the minimum of 2x+x8.
Hint · direction
What is the product of the two terms?
Hint · method
2x⋅x8=16 is a constant.
Hint · first step
2x+x8≥216.
Full solution
The minimum is 8, reached when 2x=x8, that is, x=2.
Exercise 2Basic
Let 0<x<21. Find the maximum of x(1−2x).
Hint · direction
You want the “sum” to be fixed. Is x+(1−2x) fixed?
Hint · method
Balance the coefficients: 2x+(1−2x)=1.
Hint · first step
x(1−2x)=21⋅2x(1−2x)≤21(22x+1−2x)2.
Full solution
The maximum is 21⋅41=81, reached when 2x=1−2x, that is, x=41, which is in the range.
Exercise 3Advanced
Let x>0. Find the minimum of x2+x2.
Hint · direction
Multiplying the two terms directly gives 2x, which is not constant. Which term should you split?
Hint · method
The degrees are 2 and −1: split x2 into two parts.
Hint · first step
x2+x1+x1≥331.
Full solution
The minimum is 3, reached when x2=x1, that is, x=1. You can check it in the splitting machine above with A=1,m=2,B=2,n=1.
Exercise 4Challenge
Let x>1. Find the minimum of x−1x2+3.
Hint · direction
The denominator is x−1. Substitute.
Hint · method
Let t=x−1>0, write the numerator in terms of t, and divide each term by t.
Hint · first step
x2+3=t2+2t+4, so the expression equals t+t4+2.
Full solution
t+t4≥4, so the expression is ≥6, reached when t=2, that is, x=3, and 3>1 as required. The minimum is 6.
Using AM–GM twice with clashing equality conditions
✗
The wrong step: a,b>0 and a+b=1. Since a+a1≥2 and b+b1≥2, the minimum of (a+a1)(b+b1) is 4.
What went wrong? Think first, then open
DiagnosisThe two inequalities need a=1 and b=1 for equality, but then a+b=2=1. Equality cannot be reached, so 4 is only a lower bound, not the minimum. In fact at a=b=21 the product is (25)2=425, and that is the minimum.
✓
The right step: Expand: ab+ab1+ba+ab. Since ab≤41 and t+t1 is decreasing on 0<t≤41, we get ab+ab1≥417; also ba+ab≥2. Both equalities hold at a=b=21, so they are compatible, and the minimum is 425.
“Every “≥” must reach equality at the same point”
Extrema with AM–GM ← → step · F full screen · Esc exit