Skill stop · How is this move done?

Extrema with AM–GM

In the Chinese book: 用平均值不等式求极值

Positive, fixed, equal: split terms to fix the product, then check equality.

📖 §2.2 of 《平均值不等式与柯西不等式》M6 The Extremal Principle lineM17 Step-by-Step Adjustment line

Before this stop, visit:Proving Inequalities with AM–GM (Skill)

WorkbenchFind the minimum of (). Change how many parts each term is split into until “Product of the parts” shows ✓, and watch the dashed line turn into a horizontal line touching the curve.

Loading figure…

What this move does

The mean inequality links “sum” and “product”:

So when the product is fixed, the sum has a minimum; when the sum is fixed, the product has a maximum. To use it for extreme values, remember three checks: positive, fixed, equal.

  1. Positive: every term involved is a positive number.
  2. Fixed: by splitting terms and balancing coefficients, make the product (or the sum) of these terms a constant that does not depend on the variable.
  3. Equal: the equality condition (all terms equal) can really be met within the range the problem allows. Otherwise all you have is a bound.

Predict first

Let . What is the minimum of ?

Choose an answer first; then you can see the result.

Work through one

Example: the minimum of x² + 16/x (x > 0)

Step 1 / 5
Loading figure…
  1. Positive

    , so both terms are positive and AM–GM can be used.

“A fixed sum gives the largest product” is the same fact seen the other way round. For a rectangle with fixed perimeter, the sum of the sides is fixed: the area is , and .

Loading figure…
Drag the split point : the diameter () stays the same, and the half-chord is longest right in the middle, so the square has the largest area.

When it fails

Break it

Counterexample lab: remove one condition

Conclusion: the bound from AM–GM is the minimum

(): the product is the constant , so , reached at .

Loading figure…

Practice

Exercise 1Basic

Let . Find the minimum of .

Exercise 2Basic

Let . Find the maximum of .

Exercise 3Advanced

Let . Find the minimum of .

Exercise 4Challenge

Let . Find the minimum of .

Mistake Museum · Exhibits from this stop

Before you leave, look at the traps other people fell into here.See every exhibit in the museum →

Exhibit

Using AM–GM twice with clashing equality conditions

The wrong step: and . Since and , the minimum of is .
What went wrong? Think first, then open

Diagnosis The two inequalities need and for equality, but then . Equality cannot be reached, so is only a lower bound, not the minimum. In fact at the product is , and that is the minimum.

The right step: Expand: . Since and is decreasing on , we get ; also . Both equalities hold at , so they are compatible, and the minimum is .

“Every “≥” must reach equality at the same point”