Method stop · When and why do we use it?

Simplifying Calculations and Proofs with Parametric Equations

In the Chinese book: 利用参数方程简化计算及论证

Let t be signed distance on a line: Vieta then gives products, sums, midpoints.

📖 §7.4 of 《解析几何》

Before this stop, visit:Eliminating and Choosing Parameters (Skill)

One idea, one pictureTurn slowly and keep an eye on . Then drag outside the circle and turn again. Does this readout move now?

Loading figure…

In one sentence

Write the quantity you want as a symmetric expression in some parameter, and substitute the whole block using Vieta’s formulas, without finding the intersection points.

The most useful parameter is the signed distance along a line. Write the line through with angle of inclination as

Since is a unit vector, is exactly the distance from the point to , and the sign of says which side of it is on. Substitute into a conic to get ; its two roots are exactly and :

Proving the intersecting chords theorem with the parameter t

Step 1 / 4
Loading figure…
  1. Write the line

    Take the circle ( in the picture) and any chord through a point inside it, with angle of inclination .

Predict first

is a chord of the circle through . Whatever its direction, what is ?

Choose an answer first; then you can see the result.

Stop 1 · Ellipse: the chord with a given midpoint

is a point inside the ellipse . Find the slope of the line containing the chord whose midpoint is .

Substitute the parametric line: the coefficient of is . The midpoint condition is , that is, this coefficient is :

Loading figure…
Press “Turn to make P₀ the midpoint”, read off and check that . Then drag outside the ellipse: why is the button grayed out now?

In general, the chord with midpoint has slope , and we never found a single intersection point.

Stop 2 · Parabola: a focal chord

is the focus of and is a chord through . Prove that .

Substitute : .

Loading figure…
Turn and compare the absolute value of “” with “”. This is the same fact as from §6.5 (polar coordinates): multiply both sides by .

Stop 3 · An angle parameter: a two-variable extremum becomes one-variable trigonometry

One problem, several solutions

The point lies on the ellipse . Find the maximum of .

Set x + 2y = m and use the discriminant

Substitute : , that is . For to have a real solution, , so and the maximum is .

CostSubstitute, tidy up, solve an inequality: three steps, each easy to get wrong.

The eccentric angle as parameter

Set . Then , reached at , that is at .

CostOne line, and you see at once where the maximum is reached.

The parameter turns “two variables + one constraint” into “one variable, no constraint”. The extremum problems at the next stop use this move again and again.

Practice

Exercise 1Basic

is a point inside the circle . Any chord through is cut by into two pieces. Find the product of their lengths.

Exercise 2Basic

For the ellipse , what is the slope of the line containing the chord whose midpoint is ?

Exercise 3Advanced

The line through with angle of inclination meets the parabola at and . Find .

Exercise 4Challenge

is a point outside the circle . A secant through meets the circle at and with ( is the nearer one). Find .

Mistake Museum · Exhibits from this stop

Before you leave, look at the traps other people fell into here.See every exhibit in the museum →

Exhibit

Finding the “chord with a given midpoint” from $t_1+t_2=0$ without checking that the chord exists

The wrong step: The chord of the ellipse with midpoint : from the slope is , so the chord lies on the line .
What went wrong? Think first, then open

Diagnosis is outside the ellipse (). Substituting into the ellipse gives with discriminant : this line does not meet the ellipse at all, so where is the chord? only means something when there are two intersection points.

The right step: First check that is inside the curve (substituting gives a value less than ), or, after finding the line, check that the discriminant is positive. When is outside the ellipse, no chord has it as midpoint.

“Before Vieta, ask the discriminant”

Exhibit

Taking $t_1t_2$ to be $|P_0A|\cdot|P_0B|$ directly

The wrong step: is inside the circle , and a chord through it is cut into two pieces whose product is .
What went wrong? Think first, then open

Diagnosis is a signed distance: when lies between and , and have opposite signs and their product is negative. A product of lengths needs an absolute value.

The right step: . Conversely, the sign of itself tells you whether lies between and .

“t carries a sign; lengths need absolute values”