Skill stop · How is this move done?

Proving Inequalities with Cauchy

In the Chinese book: 用柯西不等式证明不等式

Build two lists whose pairwise products lose every variable, leaving a constant.

📖 §4.1 of 《平均值不等式与柯西不等式》M18 Construction line

Before this stop, visit:Variants and Generalizations of Cauchy (Concept)

WorkbenchDrag . The product on the left keeps changing, yet does not move at all. Why? Then make the slack .

Loading figure…

What this move does

The Cauchy inequality is not hard in itself. The hard part is seeing where the two lists are. The move:

  1. Find two factors in the problem that can play the role of “sums of squares” (often two brackets multiplied together, or a sum you are given).
  2. Split each term into and so that in the products the variables cancel, leaving only constants or known quantities.
  3. Apply Cauchy, then check whether the equality condition (all ratios equal) can be met under the constraints.

On the workbench above, and : their sums of squares are and , while the product does not depend on . When the variables vanish from the products, the lower bound is a constant.

Predict first

. What is the minimum of ?

Choose an answer first; then you can see the result.

Work through one

Example: prove (1/a + 9/b + 16/c)(a + b + c) ≥ 64

Step 1 / 5
Loading figure…
  1. Spot the two sums of squares

    The left side is two brackets multiplied together, exactly the shape of the right side of Cauchy, . Try first: the left side is .

Another split: let 1 be the second list

Not every problem has two brackets. When there is only one sum, the other list is often just .

Example: a + b + c = 1, a, b, c > 0; prove √(3a+1) + √(3b+1) + √(3c+1) ≤ 3√2

Step 1 / 3
Loading figure…
  1. We want an upper bound for a sum of products

    The left side is a sum of three square roots; read it as with and . The picture uses some arbitrary .

In the picture the can only be multiples of , so the third step uses instead of . What matters is that they are all equal: the slack is .

Practice

Exercise 1Basic

. Find the minimum of .

Exercise 2Basic

Positive numbers satisfy . Find the maximum of .

Exercise 3Advanced

Let . Prove that .

Exercise 4Challenge

Let with . Prove that , and explain why this does not directly give .

Mistake Museum · Exhibits from this stop

Before you leave, look at the traps other people fell into here.See every exhibit in the museum →

Exhibit

Carrying on while the products still contain variables

The wrong step: Given , prove : by Cauchy, the left side is .
What went wrong? Think first, then open

Diagnosis The first step is fine, but the right side still contains variables. And it is in fact at most (Cauchy again), so the second step goes the wrong way.

The right step: Here bound each factor on its own: and ; multiplying gives .

“A good construction makes the products constant; if variables are left, check the direction first”

Exhibit

A lower bound that is never reached

The wrong step: , , , so , hence the minimum is .
What went wrong? Think first, then open

Diagnosis Equality needs , i.e. , but the problem requires . The inequality itself is true; the value simply can never be reached.

The right step: On the function is increasing, so its minimum is at : .

“Before you write “the minimum is”, put the equality condition back into the constraints”