Skill stop · How is this move done?

AM–GM with Parameters

In the Chinese book: 带参数的平均值不等式

Put in an unknown parameter, then choose it so all equality cases meet.

📖 §2.5 of 《平均值不等式与柯西不等式》

Before this stop, visit:Variants of AM–GM (Skill)

WorkbenchFind the maximum of . Drag . Every position gives a true upper bound. Where is the bound smallest, and actually reached?

Loading figure…

What this move does

The two-term mean inequality can carry a positive parameter :

It holds for every (it is just ). The parameter does not change whether it is true; it only changes where equality happens. So:

  1. Split the expression into a few parts and bound each with a parametrized mean inequality. The bound you get holds for every value of the parameter.
  2. Add up the steps and write down the final bound (it depends on the parameter).
  3. Solve an equation to choose the parameter so that the equality conditions of all the steps are compatible (typically: several coefficients are equal). Only then is the bound the extreme value.

Predict first

For to reach equality when , what should be?

Choose an answer first; then you can see the result.

Work through one

Example: the maximum of (xy + 2yz)/(x² + y² + z²)

Step 1 / 6
Loading figure…
  1. Why split y²?

    has to be bounded by and , and by and : is shared by both. Give it to them in the ratio .

Replace the in the problem by a general , and the same computation gives and the maximum . Drag in the workbench at the top to check.

Practice

Exercise 1Basic

For to reach equality when , what is ?

Exercise 2Advanced

Let be real numbers, not all . Let be the maximum of . Find .

Exercise 3Advanced

Positive numbers satisfy . Find the minimum of .

Exercise 4Challenge

Let be real numbers, not all . Find the maximum of .

Mistake Museum · Exhibits from this stop

Before you leave, look at the traps other people fell into here.See every exhibit in the museum →

Exhibit

Bounding pair by pair without a parameter

The wrong step: and ; adding, , so the maximum is .
What went wrong? Think first, then open

Diagnosis Every step is true, but equality cannot be reached. The first two steps need , and the last step enlarges and to and , so equality there needs , and then is as well. The true maximum is .

The right step: Split in an unknown ratio , and choose so that the three square terms get equal coefficients: .

“Wherever the coefficients are unbalanced, that is where the slack hides”