Concept stop · What is it?

The Fibonacci Sequence

In the Chinese book: 斐波那契数列

Domino tilings count Fibonacci numbers; one cut gives its addition formula.

📖 Chapter 9 of 《数列与数学归纳法》M7 Parity lineM13 Recursion line

Before this stop, visit:Periodic Sequences (Concept)

Hands first, words secondA 2×6 strip has 13 tilings in all. Drag the cut and watch the 13 tilings split into two piles. How big is each pile — can you say without counting?

Loading figure…

Try this

  1. Keep and drag the cut from to . The total stays , but the sizes of the two piles change. Do the two products in the formula always match the sizes of the two piles?
  2. Look at the second pile (the tilings that straddle the cut). The darker pair of lying dominoes always covers columns and . Take it away and you are left with two shorter strips.
  3. Drag to . What does the equation become? You should recognize it: it is the Fibonacci recurrence .
  4. Take , . Both products on the right contain the same factor . So is a multiple of — and that is no coincidence.

The Fibonacci sequence : , . The number of ways to tile a strip with dominoes is exactly : look at the right end — one upright domino leaves , two lying dominoes leave . Put the observations above together and you get an “addition formula”:

Predict first

A 2×8 strip has tilings. Cut after column . How many tilings have a clean cut (no lying domino crosses the cut)?

tilings
Choose an answer first; then you can see the result.

Why

“Count it twice”: count the same set of tilings once as a whole, then again split into two piles by what happens at the cut.

The addition formula: one cut through the strip

Step 1 / 6
Loading figure…
  1. What we count

    A 2×7 strip has tilings. Draw a dashed line after column and ask: is the tiling broken or joined at this line?

One more step leads to the most beautiful property of the Fibonacci sequence: to find the gcd of two terms, find the gcd of their indices.

Divisibility and the gcd

Step 1 / 4
  1. First: a multiple index gives a multiple

    Induct on . is clear. If , put , in the addition formula: both terms contain the factor .

Squares into a rectangle

Squares of side , each glued onto the long side of the figure so far, always fit together exactly into a rectangle. Adding a square turns the sides of the figure from into — that is the recurrence. Count the area:

Loading figure…
The last readout is the ratio of neighboring terms, . Increase one step at a time: it jumps back and forth across , getting closer each time.

Predict first

The ratios are . How does the sign of their difference from behave?

Choose an answer first; then you can see the result.

Remove one condition

Break it

Counterexample lab: remove one condition

Conclusion: : the squares make a rectangle

The first two Fibonacci numbers are both : the second square exactly covers one side of the first, and from then on every square fits exactly.

Loading figure…

Practice

Exercise 1Basic

Find .

Exercise 2Basic

In how many ways can a strip be tiled with dominoes?

Exercise 3Advanced

Find the greatest common divisor of and .

Exercise 4Challenge

Prove that for every positive integer .

Mistake Museum · Exhibits from this stop

Before you leave, look at the traps other people fell into here.See every exhibit in the museum →

Exhibit

The number of tilings is off from the Fibonacci index by one

The wrong step: A 2×n strip has tilings, so a 2×5 strip has tilings.
What went wrong? Think first, then open

Diagnosis In this book's notation . A 2×1 strip has tiling and a 2×2 strip has (two upright or two lying), so the tiling counts start — one place ahead of , which starts .

The right step: A 2×n strip has tilings; a 2×5 strip has . Line up the indices with the two or three smallest before using a formula.

“Check the indices against n = 1, 2 first”

Exhibit

Treating a necessary condition as a sufficient one

The wrong step: We know: if is prime (), then is prime. is prime, so is prime.
What went wrong? Think first, then open

Diagnosis The first sentence says: if is composite (), then has a proper factor ( a proper divisor of ), so it is not prime. It does not say that is prime whenever is. In fact .

The right step: “ is prime” is only a necessary condition for to be prime. To decide about you have to factor it separately.

“The converse needs its own proof”